Why Does Modern Music Lacks the Heart and Soul of Classic Hits?
Every listener has their unique taste in music. Your preference might lean towards today's popular tracks, while others might hold a deep affection for the rich tones of music from the early 20th century. And it’s perfectly okay not to agree on taste. However, the question I pose today goes beyond personal preference: why does modern music often fail to capture the same emotion and passion found in older tracks?
The Lifting of Emotional Elements in Modern Music
The answer lies in the core of what makes a song: talent, great songwriting, passion, and the inclusion of heart and soul. These elements are abundant in older music because it emanated from musicians who poured their heart and soul into their work. Consider Whole Lotta Love by Led Zeppelin, a song overflowing with emotive intensity and passion, compared to Taylor Swift's songs, heavily produced and likely written by multiple anonymous individuals. The latter, though undoubtedly talented, does lack the raw, poignant heart that the former embodies.
Evolution of Music and Its Acceptance of New Trends
Music, more than any other art form, lags behind the times in terms of accepting new trends. Over a century ago, music that now stands as a masterpiece of modern times, such as Debussy's Prelude to the Afternoon of a Faun, was met with widespread rejection and comparison to barnyard sounds. This was an era where new chords and rhythms that sounded jarring and dissonant were groundbreaking. These innovations eventually transformed into the harmonies of jazz and popular music, demonstrating how once-revolutionary styles become the norm over time.
Conventional Tearing and New Ideas in Early 20th Century
What many fail to realize is that the progression from conventional to avant-garde is a natural evolution reflecting the exploitation of past conventions. After the horrors of World War I, modern composers like Debussy, Stravinsky, and others questioned and dismantled musical norms. They sought new ideas, and perhaps the most striking example of this is Stravinsky's The Rite of Spring. This ballet, which debuted in 1913, was met with outrage for its unconventional rhythms and harmonies, thus changing the face of music forever.
The Disconnect Between Old and New: A Taste Issue?
But isn't all this modern music unlistenable? The answer is a resounding no. The materials used in creating modern music are simply different; they are a testament to evolving tastes and styles. Some might find these materials unappealing, which indeed boils down to personal taste. Nonetheless, there is a vast arsenal of 20th-century music that delivers the same, if not more, thrilling, beautiful, and enchanting experiences as their classical counterparts. Let me suggest some tracks for your exploration:
Debussy: Prelude to the Afternoon of a FaunPiano Preludes Books 1 and 2 Stravinsky: The Rite of Spring
Petrushka
The Symphony of Psalms
The Soldier's Tale Bartok: Concerto for Orchestra
String Quartets 4 and 5 Berg: Wozzeck
Violin Concerto Schoenberg: String
Delving into these classical pieces might just change your perspective on modern music, making you appreciate the artistry and emotion conveyed in each note. So, next time you listen to a piece of modern music, try to dig deeper and find the heart and soul within it. It may just resonate more than you think.
Do you feel that modern music lacks heart and soul? Share your thoughts in the comments below. And if you have any other tracks you believe should be added to this list, feel free to add them!