Ron Ron Wood vs Mick Taylor: Which Guitarist Best Fits the Rolling Stones?

Introduction

In the history of rock and roll, the debate around which guitarist better served the Rolling Stones has never been more polarizing. It's a conversation that centers on two iconic figures: Mick Taylor and Ronnie Wood. This article explores the dynamics that made Wood a better fit for the band compared to Taylor, offering a detailed comparison of their respective contributions.

The Faces Man and the Rolling Stones

While Ron Wood may be best known for his association with the Rolling Stones, his earlier career as a member of The Faces sets the stage for his eventual entrance into the Stones.

Wood's Early Career: Ron Wood was an integral part of The Faces, a band where he served as both a guitarist and a bassist, forming close bonds with the members. The connection between The Faces and the Rolling Stones was not just professional; Wood was already familiar with several members of the Stones and enjoyed a rapport with them.

Mick Taylor's Time in the Band

The relationship between Mick Taylor and the Rolling Stones was marked by both brilliance and conflict. Taylor joined the band in the mid-1970s, bringing his virtuosic guitar skills and a different aura to the group.

Taylor's Contributions: Though renowned for his technical guitar skills, including the playing of "Torn Up by Love," Taylor's tenure with the Rolling Stones was not always harmonious. His decision to leave the band was influenced by personal struggles and the promise of greater recognition and prosperity elsewhere. Despite his talent, Taylor never met the band's expectations for longevity and personal connection. He was a 'musician's musician' rather than a 'rock star,' and his lifestyle and artistry were not aligned with the band's ethos.

Ron Wood: A Better Fit

Ron Wood, on the other hand, brought a different energy and personality to the Rolling Stones. His time with The Faces and his personal relationship with Keith Richards played a pivotal role in his integration into the band.

Wood's Contributions: Wood's all-round skills as a guitarist and bassist aligned perfectly with the band's original sound. He complemented Keith Richards' playing style, enhancing the band's chemistry. His friendly nature and relatable personality made him an instant hit with the band members, leading to a seamless and cohesive transition. Unlike Taylor, Wood was not just another virtuoso musician but a genuine bandmate who complemented Keith Richards' 'old school' approach and helped the band reinvigorate its original sound.

The Rolling Stones' Perspective

The band's own perspective on Taylor and Wood reveals a deeper understanding of what they needed after changing lineups:

Taylor's Departure: Mick Taylor left the band due to increased substance abuse and a desire for greater individual recognition. While his guitar playing was exceptional, the band felt he was held back by his playing style and his attitude did not align with the band's laid-back image. Wood's Integration: Ron Wood's contributions were more about blending the original sound with his multi-instrumental talents. He brought a sense of familiarity and shared history with Keith Richards, making the transition smoother and more natural. Aesthetic and Personal Fit: The Rolling Stones emphasized their unique way of life, which Mick Taylor did not fully embody. The band's aesthetic and personal fit were more crucial than individual virtuosity, and Wood's all-round talent matched these criteria.

Conclusion

The debate over whether Ron Wood or Mick Taylor was the better fit for the Rolling Stones brings us full circle. While Taylor's virtuosic skills were instrumental in reviving the band's music in the late 1970s, it was Wood's ability to embody the band's ethos and his multi-faceted talent that made him the perfect successor. His ability to complement Keith Richards and his overall fit with the band's history and legacy ensured his longevity and continued relevance in the Stones' music.