A Classic Revisited: The Beatles' 'Here Comes the Sun' vs. Aerosmith's Cover

In the vast landscape of classic rock, few songs stand the test of time like The Beatles' 'Here Comes the Sun' from their 1969 Abbey Road album. Known for its innovative sound, strong lyrical content, and John Lennon's distinctive vocal style, this classic has undoubtedly influenced countless artists. But in 1978, Aerosmith, with their signature rock style, released their own rendition for the soundtrack to Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band. Let's delve into the differences and the enduring appeal of both versions.

Summary of the Original Version

Released in 1969 on the album Abbey Road: The original version of 'Here Comes the Sun' by The Beatles stands as a testament to the band's innovative spirit. Known for its understated yet powerful sound, the track's lyrical content offers a unique voice of hope during a time of unrest. John Lennon's vocals—both soothing and poignant—have made this song a timeless classic, remaining iconic in rock history.

The Aerosmith Cover

Released in 1978 for the Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band soundtrack: Aerosmith's take on 'Here Comes the Sun' showcases a different interpretation. With Steven Tyler's powerful vocals and a more aggressive instrumental arrangement, the band brought the song to a new and wider generation. This version maintains the essence of the original but infuses it with the high-energy rock vibe that audiences have come to love from Aerosmith.

Comparison of the Two Versions

Fans of Classic Rock: Those who appreciate the historical significance and depth of the original 'Here Comes the Sun' might find it more satisfying. The quiet and understated nature of the Beatles' version allows for a better focus on the lyrics, which themselves are full of humor and positivity. The song's tone is one of subtle hope and optimism, making it a true classic.

Modern Rock Lovers: Those who enjoy a more energetic and modern rock sound may prefer Aerosmith's energetic take on the song. Steven Tyler's powerful vocals and the added guitar solos create a distinctively Aerosmith sound, bringing the song to a new audience and highlighting a different approach to the theme of hope and renewal.

Ultimately, it comes down to individual preference: While some might prefer the raw authenticity of The Beatles, others might enjoy the high-energy rock vibe of Aerosmith. Both versions of the song have their merits and appeal to different listeners based on their unique style and execution.

Personal Assessment and Analysis

I would say that the Beatles' version is a clearer and more committed version of the original. The song picks a tone and commits to it, and the quietude allows for better focus on the lyrics, where there's a noticeable humor in the writing. While Steven Tyler does a great job, his delivery sometimes sounds a bit harsh, which can detract from the smiles the lyrics should evoke.

Primary Considerations:

The Beatles' version is closer to the original, with less guitar fills and a more seamless arrangement. The solos in the Beatles' record are more like riffs and there's an organ solo as well. Aerosmith's version, while powerful and engaging, has a solo that reminds one of a Beatles record, but the solos in the Beatles' record feel integral to the song and uncover a subtle humor.

In the comparison, the Beatles' version exudes a subtle humor and nuanced delivery, making it almost a perfect coin toss between a happy version by The Beatles and a charged version by Aerosmith. Both versions capture the essence of the song, but the Beatles' version offers a more committed interpretation and focuses more on the lyrical humor.

Note: This analysis is subjective and based on personal preference. The Beatles' version remains a classic, and Aerosmith's cover brings a fresh take on an iconic song.